The Department for International Development (DFID) is reorganising its Security and Justice material with a view to presenting it on one website by the end of 2010.
For justice, conflict and fragile states resources visit the
What is the relationship between military power and international order? What impact did the development of nuclear weapons have on this relationship? This paper from the Journal of International Affairs is an abridged version of Michael Howard’s inaugural lecture at King’s College London in May 1964. It concludes that in the era of nuclear weapons, military power can only serve as an instrument of international order if it is subject to rigorous political control.
Howard argues that the capacity of states to defend themselves, and their evident willingness to do so, provides the basic framework for international relations. International order is based not on agreement, but on the recognition of disagreement between states. As a result, the conduct of international relations must always be a delicate adjustment of power to power. It is a mutual exploration of intentions and capabilities so as to find and preserve an order which, though satisfying nobody, is tolerable to all.
The change in international relations brought about by the introduction of nuclear weapons should not be overestimated. Power is the raw material of politics and violence remains an accepted, although rarely used, means to secure or attain it.
As a result, in the era of nuclear weapons, military power can only serve as an instrument of international order if three conditions are met. The first is complete mutual understanding and cooperation between civil and military leaders. The second is the effective functioning of the mechanism of command and control. The third is entire discipline and obedience in every rank of military hierarchy. In addition:
Author: Michael Howard
Source: Howard M., 2009, 'Military power and international order', International Affairs, Volume 85, Issue 1, pp. 145-155
Size: 11 pages