The Department for International Development (DFID) is reorganising its Security and Justice material with a view to presenting it on one website by the end of 2010.
For justice, conflict and fragile states resources visit the
The Tswalu Protocol recognises the ad hoc nature of international responses to armed conflict and state failure. This Brenthurst Foundation and the Danish International Development Agency (Danida) publication, instead of simply calling for more coordination, offers a set of principles and guidelines that future peacebuilders can use to help offset the inherent limitations of any multilateral operation.
A common approach to peacebuilding is needed. Peacebuilding is synonymous with 'stabilisation', the aim being to support countries emerging from conflict by preventing or reducing violence, protecting people and key institutions, promoting political processes which lead to greater stability, and preparing for longer-term, non-violent politics and development. Yet over the past 15 years peacebuilding interventions have fallen short due to a number of reasons, in part because there has been a lack of: security; strategic planning; a directing authority; cultural education and awareness of foreign personnel; local capacity; tolerance of risk; funding; and programmes for job creation and basic services.
The following principles should govern every sector of the international response for peacebuilding. Failure to adhere to a key principle has jeopardised the success of previous missions:
Successful peacebuilding requires the restoration of a functioning state by focusing on security, development and governance. The Tswalu Protocal identifies ten measures for improving the effectiveness of peacebuilding interventions, including:
Author: Greg Mills
Source: Mills, G. et al, 2008, 'The Tswalu Protocol: Principles and Guidelines for Peace-Building Missions', The Brenthurst Foundation and the Danish International Development Agency (Danida).
(63 kB)